This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide To reduce the huge energy cost of CO 2 capture technology applicable in industry, the CO 2 absorption–desorption performance was conducted in a novel bench-scale pilot plant with hot water as a heat source. The trisolvent MEA(monoethanol amine)–BEA(butylethanol amine)–AMP(2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol) was prepared at a specific concentration to analyze the CO 2 capture performance and compared with 5 M MEA as the benchmark. Meanwhile, several solid acid catalysts, blended H-ZSM-5/γ-Al 2 O 3 (1/2), or HND-8, were packed in the desorber, and the solid base catalyst, CaCO 3 or CaMg(CO 3 ) 2, was packed in the absorber with random packing. The CO 2 absorption efficiency (AE), cyclic capacity (CC), and heat duty (HD) were tested onto MEA–BEA–AMP and MEA under various operating conditions. Experimental results indicated that the performance of 4.3 mol/L MEA–BEA–AMP was significantly better than 5 M MEA under both catalytic and noncatalytic operation. The most energy efficient combination of this study was discovered as 0.3 + 2 + 2 mol/L MEA–BEA–AMP, with 50 g (CaCO 3 /CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 ) in the absorber and 150 g H-ZSM-5/γ-Al 2 O 3 (1/2) in the desorber. The heat duty reached as low as 2.4 GJ/tCO 2 at a F G of 7.0 L/min and a F L of 70 mL/min. These results were highly applicable in an industrial amine scrubbing pilot plant for CO 2 capture.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: