Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To discover the “coordinative effect” within MEA‐polyamines, the non‐catalytic CO 2 absorption‐desorption tests were conducted within tri‐solvents of “MEA‐TETA (triethylenetetramine)‐DEEA (N, N‐diethylethanolamine)/AMP(2‐amino‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanol)” at specific concentrations of .1 ~ .5 + 2 + 2 mol/L for the first time. The energy efficient combinations were detected of MEA‐TETA based tri‐solvents with solid acid catalysts, from catalytic CO 2 desorption experiments onto MEA‐TETA‐DEEA/MEA‐TETA‐AMP with several commercial solid acid catalysts: blended γ‐Al 2 O 3 /H‐ZSM‐5 = 2:1, H‐mordenite, H‐Beta (Hβ), HND‐580, and HND‐8. Three parameters were adopted to evaluate desorption activity: average desorption rate, heat duty, and desorption factors (DFs). After analyses, the .1 + 2 + 2 mol/L MEA‐TETA‐AMP with catalyst HND‐8 possessed the best CO 2 desorption at 95–98°C with biggest DF. The desorption ability of DEEA was better than AMP, but with aid of solid acid catalyst, the AMP can release more CO 2 than DEEA due to weak stability of AMP‐CO 2 − carbamate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: