Key result
A modality-independent terminology is proposed to help physicians interpret fluoroscopic, MSCT, echocardiographic, and MRI images in the context of transcatheter heart valve therapies.
Proposes a standardized, modality-independent terminology to help physicians interpret cardiac anatomy across various imaging modalities used in transcatheter structural heart interventions.
May standardize cross-modality communication in transcatheter valve therapies; leaves open validation of clinical impact.
Interventional cardiologists have traditionally relied upon fluoro-scopic imaging for percutaneous coronary interventions. Transcatheter structural heart interventions, however, require additional imaging modalities such as echocardiography and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for pre-, intra- and post-procedural assistance. MSCT has emerged as the critical imaging modality for patient and device selection prior to transcatheter structural heart interventions. MSCT is unique as it provides a complete 3-dimensional (3D) dataset of the heart and vasculature that is amenable to multiplanar reconstruction for 2-dimensional (2D) or volume-rendered interpretations. Herein, we present a modality-independent terminology for understanding volumetric images in the context of transcatheter heart valve therapies. The goal of this system is to allow physicians to readily interpret the orientation of fluoroscopic, MSCT, echocardiographic and MRI images, thus generalising their understanding of cardiac anatomy to all imaging modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piazza et al. (2016) conducted a review in transcatheter structural heart interventions. modality-independent terminology was evaluated. A modality-independent terminology is proposed to help physicians interpret fluoroscopic, MSCT, echocardiographic, and MRI images in the context of transcatheter heart valve therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: