Key result
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a home-based disease management program improves quality of life and readmission rates in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Most elderly CHF patients rehabilitate at home after hospital treatment, but home rehabilitation outcomes remain unsatisfactory.
Does a home-based disease management program based on the dyadic illness management theory improve quality of life and reduce readmissions in elderly patients with chronic heart failure and their informal caregivers?
RCT (n=160)
Single-blind (outcome assessors and data analysts)
Randomized numerical table
No
Does a home-based disease management program based on the dyadic illness management theory improve quality of life and reduce readmissions in elderly patients with chronic heart failure and their informal caregivers?
BACKGROUND: Currently, most elderly chronic heart failure (CHF) patients go home for rehabilitation after certain treatment in hospitals. However, the results of their rehabilitation at home are not satisfactory. According to studies, dyadic treatments can increase the efficiency of home rehabilitation, enhance both partners' quality of life, lessen the caregiver's load of care, and alleviate the strain of medical resources. Thus, the aim of our research is to design a study protocol that included elderly CHF patients and their informal caregivers as an intervention unit and to explore the impact of the protocol on their health and physical outcomes. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in a triple-A hospital. In total, 80 elderly CHF patients and informal caregivers (80 dyads) will be recruited with informed consent. Based on the randomized numbers, they are divided into a control group (40 dyads) and an intervention group (40 dyads), subjects in the control group will receive usual care, and subjects in the intervention group will receive a home-based disease management program based on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management on the basis of the control group. The duration of the intervention is 3 months, and the follow-up is 6 months. Data is collected at enrolment, 3 months after the intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome is patients' quality of life and readmission. Secondary outcomes include patients' self-management behaviors, anxiety, and depression and caregivers' quality of life and care burden. DISCUSSION: This study focuses on whether this home-based disease management program can improve the quality of life of elderly patients with CHF, reduce the readmission rate, enhance their self-management capacity, reduce negative emotions, and reduce the burden of informal caregivers. It can provide a new perspective on home management and cardiac rehabilitation of heart failure disease in the elderly, as well as alleviate problems such as the burden of healthcare resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCRT2300068026. Registered on 3 February 2023, manuscript Version: 1.0, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=160). Home-based disease management program based on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management vs. Usual care was evaluated on Patients' quality of life (MLHFQ) and readmission rate. This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a home-based disease management program improves quality of life and readmission rates in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: