Key result
A web-based telemonitoring system with visiting nursing support significantly improved physical health-related quality of life from baseline to six months in patients with heart failure, whereas a smartphone application without nursing support did not.
Why the study?
This study aimed to measure health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure using two types of telemonitoring tools and evaluate which tool best improves patient outcomes.
Does a web-based telemonitoring system with visiting nursing support improve health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure compared to a smartphone application without visiting nursing support?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does a web-based telemonitoring system with visiting nursing support improve health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure compared to a smartphone application without visiting nursing support?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.58% vs 5.2%
A web-based telemonitoring system combined with visiting nursing support significantly improved physical health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure over 6 months.
Web-based telemonitoring with nursing support was associated with physical HR-QOL gains in HF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Objective: This study aims to measure the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) of patients with heart failure (HF) after using two types of telemonitoring (TM) tools and to evaluate which type of tool contributes to improving patient outcomes. Methods: We measured the HR-QOL and psychological status of patients with HF after using two types of TM systems (smartphone application or web-based), and the data from baseline to six months were compared. Results: A total of 24 patients with HF completed the study period of six months. The mean age of the participants was 60.58 ± 12.81 years, and 70.8% were male. The major differences between the study groups comprised support and access to home visit services. The physical HR-QOL scores increased significantly from baseline to six months in the web-based group (baseline vs. six months, 4.04 ± 1.02 vs. 4.58 ± 1.18, p =.034), but no significant difference (baseline vs. six months, 5.05 ± 1.00 vs. 5.20 ± 1.24, p =.410) was found in the smartphone application group. The mean scores for anxiety and depression in both groups were not significantly different. Conclusions: Using the TM system for patients with HF may improve global HR-QOL and psychological status. In addition, adding nursing support using a TM system may be more effective in improving patient-reported outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sano et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=24). Web-based telemonitoring system with visiting nursing support vs. Smartphone application telemonitoring system without visiting nursing support was evaluated on Physical health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) score at 6 months. A web-based telemonitoring system with visiting nursing support significantly improved physical health-related quality of life from baseline to six months in patients with heart failure, whereas a smartphone application without nursing support did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: