Key result
Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation provided a similar improvement in total QoL index as standard outpatient rehabilitation in heart failure patients, though subscale improvements differed.
Why the study?
Does home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life compared to outpatient-based standard cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients?
Population
131 heart failure patients, mean age 56.4±10.9 years, NYHA class II/III.
Comparison
Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation… vs Traditional outpatient-based standard cardiac…
Design
RCT, Randomized into two groups
Follow-up
8 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Supports telemonitored home-based cardiac rehabilitation as a viable alternative in heart failure; extends RCT evidence for QoL equivalence beyond traditional outpatient settings.
RCT (n=131)
Randomized
Does home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life compared to outpatient-based standard cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients?
Home-based telerehabilitation provides similar overall quality of life improvements as standard outpatient rehabilitation in heart failure patients, though with greater benefits in mental rather than physical subscales.
Piotrowicz et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=131). Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation vs. Outpatient-based standard cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Quality of life (QoL) changes assessed with SF-36. Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation provided a similar improvement in total QoL index as standard outpatient rehabilitation in heart failure patients, though subscale improvements differed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: