Why the study?
Does home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure compared to standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation?
Population
152 patients with heart failure, mean age 58.1 +/- 10.2 years.
Comparison
Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation… vs Outpatient-based standard cardiac rehabilitation…
Design
RCT, randomized
Follow-up
8 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation matches standard efficacy with higher adherence; extends RCT evidence supporting remote options in heart failure.
Does home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure compared to standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation?
Home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation is as effective as standard outpatient rehabilitation in heart failure patients but yields significantly better adherence.
Piotrowicz et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: