Why the study?
Does home-based training with telemonitoring guidance improve exercise capacity and quality of life compared to centre-based training in low to moderate risk cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Population
50 low to moderate risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation
Comparison
12-week home-based training programme with… vs 12-week centre-based training programme under…
Design
RCT, randomised
Follow-up
12 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Supports home-based cardiac rehabilitation with telemonitoring in low- to moderate-risk patients; extends evidence for accessible alternatives to centre-based programs.
Does home-based training with telemonitoring guidance improve exercise capacity and quality of life compared to centre-based training in low to moderate risk cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation with telemonitoring guidance is as effective as centre-based training for improving short-term exercise capacity and quality of life in low to moderate risk patients.
Kraal et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: