Key result
Adeno-associated virus gene therapies for neurological conditions show emerging efficacy but are associated with severe adverse reactions, highlighting a critical need for unified safety reporting.
Why the study?
What are the safety and efficacy profiles of adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies in patients with rare neurological conditions?
Systematic Review
What are the safety and efficacy profiles of adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies in patients with rare neurological conditions?
AAV gene therapies in neurology show efficacy but carry risks of severe adverse reactions, necessitating consistent safety monitoring.
Severe adverse events including death in AAV gene therapies warrant caution; leaves open questions on aetiology and prevention for future trials.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies are generating much excitement in the rare disease field, particularly for previously untreatable neurological conditions. Efficacy has been claimed for several gene therapy products and the number of trials is rapidly increasing. However, reports of severe treatment-related adverse reactions are emerging, including death. There is still insufficient knowledge about their aetiology, prevention and treatment. We therefore undertook to systematically review publicly available data on AAV gene therapies in order to collate existing information on both safety and efficacy. Here, we review emerging efficacy reports of these novel therapies, many of which show promise. We also collate an increasing number of adverse reactions. Overwhelmingly, these results make a case for unified reporting of adverse events. This is likely to be critical for improving the safety of these promising treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horton et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Neurological conditions. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies was evaluated on Safety and efficacy. Adeno-associated virus gene therapies for neurological conditions show emerging efficacy but are associated with severe adverse reactions, highlighting a critical need for unified safety reporting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: