Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular death and heart failure rehospitalization compared to ACEI/ARB in acute decompensated heart failure (HR 0.650; 95% CI 0.435-0.971; p=0.035).
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during index hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure remained unclear.
Does early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for ADHF with reduced ejection fraction compared to ACEI/ARB?
Cohort (n=502)
Assessor-Blinded
Yes
Does early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for ADHF with reduced ejection fraction compared to ACEI/ARB?
Hazard Ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.435–0.971)
Absolute Event Rate: 15.9% vs 23.5%
p-value: p=0.035
Early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction significantly reduces the 3-month risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure rehospitalization compared to ACEI/ARB therapy.
May support sacubitril/valsartan in acute decompensated heart failure; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The 3-month period after hospitalization for acute cardiac failure is a vulnerable phase with the highest risk of mortality and rehospitalization. Safety and efficacy of early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during the index hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is unclear. Therefore, we tested whether sacubitril/valsartan could result in a lower rate of a composite outcome of first hospitalization for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes compared to inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system alone. METHODS: We enrolled patients hospitalized for ADHF and reduced ejection fraction at 4 sites; patients were divided into a sacubitril/valsartan group or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) group. All patients were followed up for 3 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was outcomes as a composite of death from cardiovascular causes and rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients who received sacubitril/valsartan and 251 patients who received ACEIs/ARBs had similar propensity scores and were included and compared. The primary endpoint was reached in 40 patients (15.9%) treated with sacubitril/valsartan and in 59 patients (23.5%) managed by ACEI/ARB (HR, 0.650; 95% CI: 0.435-0.971; p = 0.035). The NYHA class improved in 72.1% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group and in 59.8% of patients in the ACEI/ARB group (HR, 1.303; 95% CI: 1.097-1.548, p = 0.004). The key safety outcomes endpoints did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with ADHF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, we observed that sacubitril/valsartan therapy led to reduction in death from cardiovascular causes and rehospitalizations for heart failure when compared to ACEI/ARB therapy alone during the vulnerable phase. Our results support that sacubitril/valsartan may be administered early in the vulnerable phase after ADHF and improves NYHA class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (n=502). Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was evaluated on Composite of death from cardiovascular causes and rehospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.650, 95% CI 0.435-0.971, p=0.035). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular death and heart failure rehospitalization compared to ACEI/ARB in acute decompensated heart failure (HR 0.650; 95% CI 0.435-0.971; p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: