Why the study?
Does obesity differentially influence the pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive effects of water-soluble (atenolol) versus liposoluble (metoprolol) beta-blockers?
Does obesity differentially influence the pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive effects of water-soluble (atenolol) versus liposoluble (metoprolol) beta-blockers?
In obese hypertensive patients, obesity alters the pharmacokinetics of lipophilic metoprolol but not hydrophilic atenolol, though this does not affect their antihypertensive efficacy, suggesting plasma concentrations are not reliable predictors of therapeutic effect in this population.
Does not support PK-guided dosing adjustments in obese hypertensives; extends evidence of selective lipophilic drug kinetic changes without efficacy impact.
Beta-blockers are among the most widely used antihypertensive drugs. They differ from each other in regard to several factors such as: beta-agonist activity, beta 1-selectivity and solubility. Aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of obesity on the kinetics and the antihypertensive effect of two Beta-blockers with different solubility such as: the water-soluble, atenolol and the liposoluble, metoprolol. The study was carried out according to an open randomized cross-over design. Eight obese hypertensive patients, after a two week washout period, were randomly allocated to a four week treatment. After a two week intermediate washout period, each patient switched to the other treatment for an additional four week period. On the first and the last day of each treatment the subjects were hospitalized to collect blood samples for the assay of the two drugs and to measure cardiovascular parameters. Obesity does not exert any effect on the kinetics of the water-soluble beta-blocker, atenolol, while markedly interferes with that of the liposoluble, without any apparent influence on its anti-hypertensive effect. These findings extend to obese hypertensives the concept that the plasma concentrations of beta-blocking agents are not reliable predictors of their therapeutic effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galletti et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: