Key result
Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation lowers daytime ambulatory SBP by ~6 mm Hg versus sham.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.
Does endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduce daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure in patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension off medications?
Population
146 patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension off antihypertensive medications
Comparison
Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation vs sham procedure with renal angiography only
Design
Multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial
Follow-up
2 months
Authors
Loading...
May support renal denervation as adjunctive hypertension therapy; leaves open long-term durability and optimal patient selection.
RCT (n=146)
Single-blind
1:1
Yes
Does endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduce daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure in patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension off medications?
Mean Difference: -6.3 (95% CI -9.4–-3.1)
Absolute Event Rate: -8.5% vs -2.2%
p-value: p=0.0001
Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation significantly reduces ambulatory blood pressure at 2 months compared to a sham procedure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension off medications.
Azizi et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Combined systolic-diastolic hypertension (n=146). Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation vs. Sham procedure (renal angiography only) was evaluated on Change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months (Difference -6.3 mm Hg, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.1, p=0.0001). Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation significantly reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure compared with a sham procedure (difference -6.3 mm Hg; 95% CI -9.4 to -3.1; p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: