Why the study?
Does 24-hour monitoring reveal significant circadian rhythmicity and within-day variability in blood pressure and pulse in middle-aged men with borderline hypertension?
Does 24-hour monitoring reveal significant circadian rhythmicity and within-day variability in blood pressure and pulse in middle-aged men with borderline hypertension?
Blood pressure and pulse exhibit marked circadian rhythmic variability, highlighting the limitations of casual, time-unspecified spot checks for diagnosing and managing hypertension.
May support ambulatory monitoring to capture circadian BP variability; leaves open whether this refines diagnosis or management in borderline hypertension.
Blood pressure and pulse were monitored throughout 24 hours in 13 middle-aged men using a sphygmomanometer with an automatically inflatable cuff. These volunteers were in part mistakenly believed to have a "mildly elevated blood pressure" (in the light of a conventional non-chronobiologic approach, involving time-unspecified spot checks of blood pressure). Within about 24 hours, blood pressures and pulse varied remarkably: the coefficient of variation extended from 6.9 to 14.9% for systolic blood pressure (SBP), from 8.5 to 15.4% for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and from 8.0 to 17.9% for pulse. By applying the single cosinor method (involving the least-squares fit of a 24-hour cosine curve), statistically significant circadian rhythms were observed in SBP, DBP, and pulse in all but 2 cases. In most cases, the timing of peak values was estimated to be in the evening for all 3 variables. Circadian rhythmicity accounted for up to 46, 30, and 42% of the total variability of SBP, DBP, and pulse, respectively. This marked circadian rhythmic variability is an important aspect of cardiovascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koga et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: