Key result
Myocardial infarction size was significantly positively correlated with intramyocardial hemorrhage size on day 2 (r = 0.677, P<0.01) and day 7 (r = 0.711, P<0.01) in a rat model of acute reperfused myocardial ischemia.
Why the study?
Previous studies showed hemorrhage only occurred with the largest infarctions with limited infarction size ranges, prompting investigation into correlations between IMH, MI, and myocardial edema from days 2 to 7.
Effect estimate: r = 0.677
p-value: p=<0.01
In a rat model of reperfused myocardial infarction, infarct size is a critical independent predictor of intramyocardial hemorrhage, demonstrating that hemorrhage can occur even in smaller infarctions.
Findings in this animal model may inform imaging protocols; leaves open translation to human post-MI assessment.
Background: In the previous studies, hemorrhage occurred only with the largest infarctions and studies confirmed a moderate correlation between the extent of necrosis and hemorrhage, but the extent of infarction size of these studies was limited. This study was to find the correlations between intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH), myocardial infarction (MI), and myocardial edema (ME) from days 2 to 7 in a 7.0T MR scanner.Methods: The different degrees of myocardial ischemia were induced by occluding different sections of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (1–3 mm under the left auricle). T2*-mapping, T2-mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences were performed on a 7.0T MR system at day 2 and 7. T2*- and T2-maps were calculated using a custom-made software. All areas were expressed as a percentage of the whole myocardial tissue of the left ventricle. The rats were divided into two groups based on the T2* results; MI with IMH was referred to as the +IMH group, while MI without IMH was referred to as the –IMH group.Results: The final experimental sample consisted of 25 rats in the +IMH group and 10 rats in the –IMH group. For the +IMH group. On day 2, There was a significant positive correlation between IMH size and MI size (r = 0.677, P<0.01), and a positive correlation between IMH size and ME size (r = 0.552, P<0.01). On day 7, There was a significant positive correlation between IMH size and MI size (r = 0.711, P<0.01), while no correlation was found between IMH size and ME size (r = 0.429, P = 0.097). Conclusions: Infarction size prior to reperfusion is a critical factor in determining whether a MI is hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic in rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2021) studied Acute reperfused myocardial ischemia (n=35). Myocardial infarction size vs. Non-hemorrhagic myocardial infarction was evaluated on Correlation between intramyocardial hemorrhage size and myocardial infarction size on day 2 (r = 0.677, p=<0.01). Myocardial infarction size was significantly positively correlated with intramyocardial hemorrhage size on day 2 (r = 0.677, P<0.01) and day 7 (r = 0.711, P<0.01) in a rat model of acute reperfused myocardial ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: