Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project has initiated the Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study) including genomic and omics investigations and conducted a self-administered food frequency questionnaire with the response option "constitutionally unable to eat or drink it" for individual food items (TMM-FFQ) for pregnant women. This study evaluated the validity of the TMM-FFQ among pregnant women. METHODS: Participants comprised 122 pregnant women aged ≥20 years residing in Miyagi Prefecture who completed weighed food records (WFRs) for 3 days as reference intake and the TMM-FFQ during mid-pregnancy. Correlations between nutrient or food group intakes based on the WFR and the TMM-FFQ were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (CCs), adjusting for energy intake and correcting for random within-individual variation of WFR. Cross-classification was also conducted according to quintiles using the WFR and TMM-FFQ data. RESULTS: The percentages of participants who chose the "constitutionally unable to eat or drink it" option were >3% for seven food and drink items. CCs were >0.30 for 31 nutrients; the median across energy and 44 nutrients was 0.41. CCs were >0.30 for 14 food groups; the median across 20 food groups was 0.35. The median percentages of cross-classification into exact plus adjacent quintiles and extreme quintiles were 63.1% and 3.3% for energy and nutrients and 61.9% and 4.1% for food groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The validity of the TMM-FFQ compared with the WFR was reasonable for certain nutrients and food groups among pregnant women in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murakami et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: