Key result
Male sex was associated with a significantly higher multivariable-adjusted odds of stroke (OR 1.27) compared to female sex among Chinese adults aged 40 years and older.
Why the study?
Stroke is the leading cause of death in China, but no studies had focused on sex differences in stroke risk factors among Chinese adults.
Cross-Sectional (n=726,451)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.27 (95% CI 1.23–1.32)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.3% vs 1.94%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In a nationally representative sample of Chinese adults aged 40 and older, significant sex differences exist in stroke risk factors, with men having a higher risk of stroke, hyperlipidemia, and smoking, while women have higher rates of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, physical inactivity, and obesity.
Sex-specific stroke risk profiles in Chinese adults may guide prevention; leaves open causal confirmation in prospective studies.
Stroke has become a major public health concern globally.1 The burden of stroke has increased significantly worldwide in the past two decades. The incidence of stroke has decreased in developed countries; by contrast, it has increased significantly in developing countries.2 In China, stroke has become the first leading cause of death, and it is the most prominent factor for disability-adjusted life-years lost.3 Epidemiological studies of sex disparity in the prevalence, incidence and mortality of stroke and its risk factors have been conducted in western countries;4–8 however, no studies have focused on sex differences in the risk factors for stroke in China. With stroke becoming a great public health issue, findings on sex disparity in stroke risk factors among Chinese adults are urgently needed to facilitate future personalised healthcare management policy and planning. Thus, we aimed to examine sex differences in the risk factors for stroke based on a nationally representative population-based sample of middle-aged and older Chinese populations. The China National Stroke Screening and Prevention Project (CNSSPP) was a key national action on stroke prevention and control launched in 2011 by the Chinese government. The rationale, design and methods of the CNSSPP have previously been described in detail.9 Our study was based on the data from the CNSSPP in 30 provinces in Mainland China conducted between 1 October 2014 and 30 November 2015. Briefly, a stratified, multistage random sampling method was used to obtain a nationally representative sample of the general Chinese population aged 40 years or older. Sociodemographic characteristics, stroke history, family history of stroke, medical history and status of risk factors were collected through trained healthcare workers with a standardised questionnaire. Physical examinations included the assessment of height, weight and blood pressure and an electrocardiogram. Laboratory examinations included the measurements of serum lipids (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides) and fasting plasma glucose. The associations between sex and stroke-related risk factors, including stroke history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation (AF), smoking, overweight or obesity and physical inactivity were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis, respectively. We performed analyses by using SAS version 9.3, and all tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. A total of 726,451 respondents (53.27% women) with a mean age of 57.23 ± 11.41 years were investigated in this study. The relatively young mean age among people aged 40 years and over in our sample was due to the population structure in China (Figure 1). The age-standardised prevalence rate of stroke was 2.11%. The age-standardised prevalence of stroke was markedly higher in men compared to women (2.30% vs. 1.94%). Population pyramid of China 2014 (reproduced with permission from https://www.populationpyramid.net/china/2014/ - data source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. (Medium variant)). The sex differences in risk factors associated with stroke are shown in Table 1. Men were less likely than women to have had hypertension (odds ratio (OR) 0.87), AF (OR 0.70), and DM (OR 0.88), and to be physically inactive (OR 0.83) and overweight or obese (OR 0.88) in the multivariable adjusted model. Men were more likely than women to have had hyperlipidemia (OR 1.15), stroke (OR 1.27) and be a former or current smoker (OR 18.95) in the multivariable adjusted model. Total and age-specific associations between sex and risk factors for stroke among the population aged 40 years and over using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, residential setting, region and other variables in the model. Adjusted for ethnicity, residential setting, region and other variables in the model. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined using women as the reference for each risk factor. Of note, when stroke was the dependent variable, other risk factors are included in the multivariable regression model as control variables. Similarly, when hypertension was the dependent variable, other risk factors (except for stroke) are included in the multivariable regression model as control variables. For example, when we analysed the association between sex and diabetes mellitus (DM), in the multivariable model, we included these independent variables: age, sex, ethnicity, residential setting, region, atrial fibrillation (AF), physical inactivity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, overweight and obesity. Notably, stroke was not included in these models. However, when we analysed the association between sex and stroke, we included these independent variables: age, sex, ethnicity, residential setting, region, hypertension, AF, physical inactivity, DM, hyperlipidemia, smoking, overweight and obesity in the multivariable model. Total and age-specific associations between sex and risk factors for stroke among the population aged 40 years and over using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, residential setting, region and other variables in the model. Adjusted for ethnicity, residential setting, region and other variables in the model. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined using women as the reference for each risk factor. Of note, when stroke was the dependent variable, other risk factors are included in the multivariable regression model as control variables. Similarly, when hypertension was the dependent variable, other risk factors (except for stroke) are included in the multivariable regression model as control variables. For example, when we analysed the association between sex and diabetes mellitus (DM), in the multivariable model, we included these independent variables: age, sex, ethnicity, residential setting, region, atrial fibrillation (AF), physical inactivity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, overweight and obesity. Notably, stroke was not included in these models. However, when we analysed the association between sex and stroke, we included these independent variables: age, sex, ethnicity, residential setting, region, hypertension, AF, physical inactivity, DM, hyperlipidemia, smoking, overweight and obesity in the multivariable model. Intriguingly, men in the 40∼49-year age group were more likely than women to be overweight or obese (OR 1.09), whereas those in the other age groups had a lower odds of being overweight and obese. The sex differences in AF and cigarette smoking decreased with age; however, the differences in the risk of hyperlipidemia and stroke increased with age (Table 1). In addition, stratified analysis showed that the sex differences were significant in both rural and urban settings; however, the sex differences in the risk of DM and overweight or obesity were significant in rural areas (DM: OR 0.77; overweight or obesity: OR 0.79), but not in urban areas. Inconsistent with one previous study by Clarke et al.,10 a lower prevalence of stroke was identified in our study (5.4% vs. 2.5%). Notably, the study by Clarke and colleagues was not based on a nationally representative survey. The difference might be at least partly attributable to the participants' characteristics, including socioeconomic status, geographical regions and sample size. Like research findings in other countries,11–15 our results showed that compared to women, the age-standardised prevalence of stroke was markedly higher in men (2.30% vs. 1.94%), which is inconsistent with the results of the study by Wang et al.16 in China in 2013 (1.22% vs. 1.01%). Wang and colleagues indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the stroke prevalence in both sexes. One possible explanation was that the study by Wang and colleagues included adults aged 20 years and over, whereas the present study included adults aged 40 years and over. Another possible explanation concerns the differences in the relative significance of risk factors for stroke in two studies (such as DM, dyslipidemia, AF and overweight or obesity). More importantly, in the current study, the multivariable analyses indicate that men have a higher risk of stroke (OR 1.27). Further population and laboratory studies are clearly warranted to assess the potential biological mechanism and difference between the sexes. Our results were in agreement with previous studies17,18 showing that there were sex differences in the odds of DM and AF. In contrast to our results, Andersen et al.19 found that men more often had DM (OR 1.22), and AF and smoking were equally frequent in both sexes. One possible reason was that the study by Andersen and colleagues focused on first-ever ischaemic stroke patients aged 18 years and older, whereas the present study included a general population aged 40 years and over. In addition, a larger sample size may increase the statistical power in our study. Notably, because of the different sampling and analysis methods and temporal differences that affected the prevalence estimations, thus the results across different studies should be interpreted with caution, and more studies are warranted to confirm the sex differences in stroke risk factors among Chinese adults. This research is the first study to examine the differences in stroke-related risk factors using a nationally representative sample of middle-aged and older Chinese population. The results not only inform Chinese policy makers about priority areas for effective and tailored management strategies for preventing stroke, but also enrich the research pool of the topic within the international stroke-related research field. This study had some limitations. First, this research was a cross-sectional study, thus we cannot infer the causality from the results. Second, because our study focused only on Chinese adults aged 40 years and older, the generalisability of the data to other age groups in China may be limited. Third, the CNSSPP questionnaire did not include some potential stroke-related risk factors, such as the awareness of stroke warning signs, and dietary and psychosocial factors. In conclusion, compared to women, Chinese men were less likely to have had hypertension, AF and DM and to be physically inactive and overweight or obese, but were more likely to have hyperlipidemia, stroke and to be a smoker. The sex differences in AF, physical inactivity and cigarette smoking attenuate with age; however, the differences in DM, hyperlipidemia and stroke increase with age. The sex differences in the risk of DM and overweight or obesity were only significant in rural settings. Considering the variations between women and men in the development of stroke may provide greater insight into the design of prevention strategies and the biological research of both sexes. The authors would like to thank the 726,451 study participants of the CNSSPP and all staff members involved in this study for their painstaking efforts in conducting the data collection. SJY, YG, ZHW and ZXL contributed to the conception and design of the study. SJY, YG, LQL, HJ, FJS, XXY, XJW, WZL, CS, SH, CW, WY, FY and ZHW contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. YG drafted the manuscript. SJY, YG, HJ, FJS, LWC, WNF, CZL and ZXL critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work ensuring integrity and accuracy. The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this study was supported by the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (issued by Finance and Social Security (2011) document no. 61, Ministry of Finance), the Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Science and Technology, ‘Demonstration Application of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Prevention and Control Based on Functional Community’ (KJYY20170413162318686), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (2016YXMS215), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2018M630870). HJ’s time was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1141325), the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education and La Trobe Asia. The funding sources played no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke and stroke risk factors (n=726,451). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Stroke (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.23-1.32, p=<0.0001). Male sex was associated with a significantly higher multivariable-adjusted odds of stroke (OR 1.27) compared to female sex among Chinese adults aged 40 years and older.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: