Key result
Arterial stiffness parameters measured by echo-tracking showed good reproducibility and significant correlation between the common carotid and femoral arteries, but not the brachial artery.
Why the study?
Does the measurement site (carotid, femoral, or brachial artery) affect the reproducibility and correlation of echo-tracking derived arterial stiffness indices in patients without clinical CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=75)
Does the measurement site (carotid, femoral, or brachial artery) affect the reproducibility and correlation of echo-tracking derived arterial stiffness indices in patients without clinical CAD?
Echo-tracking derived arterial stiffness parameters are reproducible at the common carotid and femoral arteries, but the brachial artery is not a reliable site for measurement.
Site selection matters for reproducible echo-tracking stiffness measures; supports carotid/femoral use but leaves open outcome associations.
BACKGROUND: Increased arterial stiffness (AS) corresponds to an increase in cardiovascular risk. According to recent guidelines AS parameters can be measured on all superficial arteries. OBJECTIVE: Proceeding from the assumption that viscoelastic properties differ along the arterial tree we set ourselves the task to study the reproducibility of AS indices measured at the common carotid, brachial and femoral arteries. METHODS: The initial study population included 75 patients (40 ± 14.5 years, 45% males) with a variable distribution of cardiovascular risk factors and without clinical evidence of coronary artery disease. AS parameters were measured at the common carotid, brachial and femoral arteries in all patients using echo-tracking (ET) technique. In a subgroup of 36 patients we tested the interobserver variability in the three vascular territories. RESULTS: We found that there was a significant correlation between AS indices measured at the common carotid and femoral artery (with the only exception for augmentation index) and that AS parameters measured at the brachial artery did correlate neither with common carotid nor with femoral artery indices. The interobserver variability of ET derived AS parameters was good when they were measured at the carotid or femoral artery. The values of AS indices at the brachial artery however showed considerably lower interobserver agreement. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of ET derived AS parameters was good when AS was measured at the common carotid or femoral arteries. On the basis of our results brachial artery is probably not a reliable site for AS measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simova et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors without coronary artery disease (n=75). Arterial stiffness measurement using echo-tracking technique vs. Different vascular territories (common carotid, brachial, femoral arteries) was evaluated on Correlation of arterial stiffness indices between vascular territories and interobserver variability. Arterial stiffness parameters measured by echo-tracking showed good reproducibility and significant correlation between the common carotid and femoral arteries, but not the brachial artery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: