Key result
Management in a specialized heart failure clinic significantly increased the usage of guideline-directed medical therapy compared to a general cardiology outpatient department (81% vs 55%, P=0.001).
Why the study?
Most heart failure patients do not receive guideline-directed medical therapy or achieve target doses, but whether dedicated heart failure clinics improve GDMT use and target dose achievement compared to general cardiology outpatient departments warranted assessment.
Does management in a specialized heart failure clinic improve the usage of guideline-directed medical therapy and target dose achievement in patients with heart failure compared to a general cardiology outpatient department?
Observational (n=400)
No
Does management in a specialized heart failure clinic improve the usage of guideline-directed medical therapy and target dose achievement in patients with heart failure compared to a general cardiology outpatient department?
Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 55%
p-value: p=0.001
Management of heart failure patients in a specialized heart failure clinic significantly improves adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy, target dose achievement, and clinical outcomes compared to general cardiology outpatient care.
HF clinic care was associated with higher GDMT achievement; supports dedicated models but leaves open effects on hard outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The usage of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in the treatment of heart failure (HF) has shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, majority of the HF patients do not receive GDMT or do not achieve the target dose. Literature has shown that the patients who are managed in HF clinics receive GDMT and target doses of disease-modifying drugs (DMD) when compared to those treated in other general cardiology outpatient departments (OPD's). It was a retrospective hospital-based study in which patients treated in HF clinic and other cardiology OPD in the year of 2017 were included (200 patients in each arm). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of heart failure clinics in medication therapy management including usage of guideline-directed medical therapy, if target dose specified by the guideline is achieved and time to reach target dose in comparison to other general cardiology OPD's. IRB and IEC approval were obtained before the commencement of the study. Data relevant to the study were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR) and were compared between the study groups to see for the adherence to guideline and achievement of target doses. Data storage and analysis were performed using SPSS Version 24. A significance level of 5% was used. RESULTS: The usage of GDMT was higher in HF clinic when compared to other cardiology OPD (81% vs 55%, P = 0.001). A significantly higher number of patients in HF clinic achieved target dose when compared to other cardiology OPD (58% vs 29% -betablockers, 45% vs 9% -ACEI/ARB/ARNI, P = 0.000). Moreover, the number of eligible patients receiving DMD was found to be higher in HF clinic (98% vs 85% -betablockers, 69% vs 44% -ACEI/ARB/ARNI, 76% vs 44% -MRA). Also, the patients in HF clinic attained the target doses faster when compared to other cardiology OPD. In addition, there was better improvement in ejection fraction, as well as decreased rate of rehospitalisation and mortality in patients managed in HF clinic. CONCLUSION: HF clinics were compared with other cardiology OPD for various parameters and it was observed that HF clinics were better than other cardiology OPD in maintaining the medication therapy management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=400). Heart failure clinic care vs. General cardiology outpatient department care was evaluated on Usage of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (p=0.001). Management in a specialized heart failure clinic significantly increased the usage of guideline-directed medical therapy compared to a general cardiology outpatient department (81% vs 55%, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: