Key result
12 weeks of HIIT and self-selected intensity training improved cognitive inhibitory control in overweight/obese adults compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (p=0.018 and p=0.026).
Why the study?
It is unclear how exercising at different exercise intensities affects cognitive inhibitory control in overweight/obese adults.
Does high-intensity interval training or self-selected intensity training improve cognitive inhibitory control compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in overweight/obese adults?
RCT (n=64)
randomized
Does high-intensity interval training or self-selected intensity training improve cognitive inhibitory control compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in overweight/obese adults?
p-value: p=0.018 and 0.026
In overweight/obese adults, 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training or self-selected intensity training improved cognitive inhibitory control more effectively than moderate-intensity continuous training.
HIIT or SSIT may enhance inhibitory control more than MICT in overweight adults; leaves open optimal protocols pending larger trials.
Growing evidence shows that aerobic exercise improves cognitive function. However, it is unclear how exercising at different exercise intensities affects cognitive inhibitory control in overweight/obese adults. Herein we compared the effects of 12 weeks of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate‐intensity continuous training (MICT), and self‐selected intensity training (SSIT) on cognitive inhibitory control in overweight/obese adults. A total of 64 adults (59.4% women, 31.3 ± 7.1 years, 29 ± 2.5 kg/m²) were randomized into three walking/running groups: HIIT, MICT and SSIT. All groups performed three exercise sessions per week on an outdoor running track for 12 weeks. Cognitive inhibitory control was assessed at baseline and after the exercising programs using a computerized version of the Stroop Color‐Words test. The HIIT and SSIT resulted in a faster Stroop effect (i.e. enhanced performance) when compared to MICT ( p =.018; p =. 026), however, there were no significant differences between the HIIT and SSIT groups ( p >. 05). The enhanced Stroop effect was correlated with increases in cardiorespiratory fitness after HIIT (r= −.521, p =. 018) and decreases in body fat after MICT (r=. 671, p =. 001). These findings may suggest that overweight/obese adults performing exercise interventions at higher intensities or self‐selected intensity may enhance their cognitive ability to inhibit automated behavioral responses. Highlights HIIT and/or SSIT are more effective than MICT in improving cognitive inhibitory control after 12‐weeks in overweight/obese adults. Increases in cardiorespiratory fitness and decreases in body fat after HIIT and MICT were correlated with improvements in cognitive inhibitory control. Our study highlights the possibility of performing different exercise programs in an outdoor environment to improve cognitive function in overweight/obese adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Overweight/obese (n=64). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and self-selected intensity training (SSIT) vs. Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) was evaluated on Cognitive inhibitory control (Stroop Color-Words test) (p=0.018 and 0.026). 12 weeks of HIIT and self-selected intensity training improved cognitive inhibitory control in overweight/obese adults compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (p=0.018 and p=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: