Key result
Long-term use of oral anticoagulants decreases the risk of cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease, but increases the risk of bleeding.
Why the study?
Do novel oral anticoagulants reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
Do novel oral anticoagulants reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
Novel oral anticoagulants reduce cardiovascular events in CAD patients but increase bleeding risk, highlighting the need for optimal treatment combinations and dosing.
Despite advances in interventional and pharmacologic therapy, survivors of myocardial infarction remain at an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. Initial pharmacological management includes both platelet inhibition and parenteral anticoagulation, whereas long-term pharmacological therapy relies on antiplatelet therapy for prevention of thrombotic complications. Biomarkers showing ongoing thrombin generation after acute coronary syndromes suggest that anticoagulants may provide additional benefit in reducing cardiovascular events. We review the pharmacokinetics of novel anticoagulants, clinical trial results, the role of monitoring, and future directions for the use of novel oral anticoagulants in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Clinical trials have shown that long-term use of oral anticoagulants decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, but they do so at a cost of an increased risk of bleeding. Future studies will need to identify optimal treatment combinations for selected patients and conditions that address both the appropriate combination of therapy and the appropriate dosage of each agent when used in combination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMahon et al. (2016) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Novel oral anticoagulants was evaluated. Long-term use of oral anticoagulants decreases the risk of cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease, but increases the risk of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: