Why the study?
How do patient age and quality of life affect doctors' decisions to prescribe warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
How do patient age and quality of life affect doctors' decisions to prescribe warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians' reluctance to prescribe anticoagulants to elderly patients and those with perceived lower quality of life may explain the under-use of warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
we report the results of a questionnaire survey into the effect of patients' age and of medico-social factors on hospital consultants' and general practitioners' reported use of warfarin anticoagulation to treat patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). half of the general practitioners (n= 824) and all consultants in specialities likely to be involved in treating such patients (n= 207) in the former Northern Region were sent questionnaires asking for their views on the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation using anticoagulants the response rate was 56% (459/824) for general practitioners and 76% (163/207) for consultants. A patient's age was of significance to many clinicians. Forty-six percent of consultants and 43% of general practitioners felt that no patient above the age of 84 years should be treated. Medico-social factors also had an important effect on whether clinicians felt patients ought to be treated with anticoagulants. A patient's quality of life was the most important medico-social factor, with handicap and place of residence having much smaller effects. age and medico-social factors have an important effect on clinicians use of anticoagulants in NVAF and reluctance to treat elderly subjects is likely to explain much of the apparent under-use of this treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudlow et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: