Why the study?
Do self-reporting screening instruments overestimate the incidence of depression compared to diagnostic interviews in older adults with heart failure?
Do self-reporting screening instruments overestimate the incidence of depression compared to diagnostic interviews in older adults with heart failure?
Depression is highly prevalent in older adults with heart failure, but self-reported screening instruments may overestimate its incidence compared to formal diagnostic interviews.
Screening may overestimate depression in HF; challenges screening-only estimates in practice and leaves open validation of tools against current criteria.
Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening condition affecting 2.5% of Americans. Depression is reported to be present in 9.5% of the general population, but its incidence is higher in individuals with HF. The aims of this systematic review of older adults with HF were to examine the literature to: (1) identify instruments used to evaluate depression/depressive symptoms; and (2) determine the incidence of depression/depressive symptoms reported. Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria. Six self-reporting screening instruments and two diagnostic-interviews for depression were identified. Depression/depressive symptoms were reported in 14-60% of adults with HF. Use of screening instruments resulted in higher frequencies of depression/depressive symptoms (21-60%) than did diagnostic interviews (14-39%). Screening instruments established prior to the 1987 diagnostic guidelines may not reflect the current definition of depression. Depression screening instruments appear to overestimate the incidence of depression in older adults with heart failure. A complete diagnostic interview for depression should be performed prior to the treatment of older adults with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delville et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: