Key result
High-intensity interval training significantly improved forced expiratory flow (P=0.01) and recovery heart rate (P=0.00) compared to control in physically inactive college-aged male smokers.
Why the study?
The study examined the effects of exercise on health-fitness, health related quality of life, and psychological measures in college-aged smokers.
Does high-intensity interval training or continuous aerobic training improve health-fitness, HRQOL, and psychological measures in physically inactive college-aged male smokers?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
Does high-intensity interval training or continuous aerobic training improve health-fitness, HRQOL, and psychological measures in physically inactive college-aged male smokers?
p-value: p=0.01
High-intensity interval training provides superior improvements in lung function and cardiorespiratory endurance compared to continuous aerobic training in inactive college-aged male smokers.
May improve fitness in young male smokers; leaves open optimal protocols and cessation benefits in larger trials.
The study examined the effects of exercise on health-fitness, health related quality of life (HRQOL), and psychological measures in college-aged smokers. Outcomes included HRQOL, hemodynamic, anthropometric, lung function, and cardiorespiratory endurance. Sixty physically inactive college-aged male smokers (18–30 years) were randomly assigned into three groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT), continuous aerobic training (CAT), and a control (CON). Both HIIT and CAT groups completed 8 weeks of non-consecutive cycling sessions thrice weekly. The CON group were not subjected to the exercise intervention. Sixty participants met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 48 (HIIT: n = 18, CAT: n = 16, CON: n = 14) participants completed the study and were included in the final analysis. Compared to CON, HIIT significantly (p = 0.01) improved forced expiratory flow (FEF_75%) more than the CAT group (p = 0.29). HIIT provided a significant (p = 0.04) improvement in FEF_75% compared to CAT. Recovery heart rate (RHR) was significantly improved in participants assigned to HIIT (p = 0.00) and CAT (p = 0.002) groups compared with the CON. A significant difference in RHR was found in HIIT compared to CAT. The study findings indicate that both HIIT and CAT exercise interventions significantly improve markers of lung function and cardiorespiratory endurance, respectively. However, findings suggested that HIIT should be the preferred form of exercise regime among college-aged smokers for more significant, healthier benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shandu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in physically inactive college-aged male smokers (n=60). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Continuous aerobic training (CAT) and no exercise control (CON) was evaluated on Forced expiratory flow (FEF_75%) (p=0.01). High-intensity interval training significantly improved forced expiratory flow (P=0.01) and recovery heart rate (P=0.00) compared to control in physically inactive college-aged male smokers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: