Why the study?
Interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for PPCI is associated with longer delays to reperfusion, related in part to door-in to door-out (DIDO) time at the initial hospital. This study examined DIDO times and their associations with patient, hospital, and process-of-care factors.
Observational (n=988)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmark DIDO times for STEMI transfers are rarely achieved, and delays at the initial hospital significantly reduce the likelihood of timely reperfusion.
BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is associated with longer delays to reperfusion, related in part to turnaround ("door in" to "door out," or DIDO) time at the initial hospital. As part of a systematic, province-wide evaluation of STEMI care, we examined DIDO times and associations with patient, hospital, and process-of-care factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed medical chart review for STEMI patients transferred for PPCI during a 6-month period (October 1, 2008, through March 31, 2009) and linked these data to ambulance service databases. Two core laboratory cardiologists reviewed presenting ECGs to identify left bundle-branch block and, in the absence of left bundle-branch block, definite STEMI (according to both cardiologists) or an ambiguous reading. Median DIDO time was 51 minutes (25th to 75th percentile: 35-82 minutes); 14.1% of the 988 patients had a timely DIDO interval (≤30 minutes as recommended by guidelines). The data-to-decision delay was the major contributor to DIDO time. Female sex, more comorbidities, longer symptom duration, arrival by means other than ambulance, arrival at a hospital not exclusively transferring for PPCI, arrival at a center with a low STEMI volume, and an ambiguous ECG were independently associated with longer DIDO time. When turnaround was timely, 70% of patients received timely PPCI (door-to-device time ≤90 minutes) versus 14% if turnaround was not timely (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark DIDO times for STEMI patients transferred for PPCI were rarely achieved. Interventions aimed at facilitating the transfer decision, particularly in cases of ECGs that are difficult to interpret, are likely to have the best impact on reducing delay to reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lambert et al. (2014) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=988). Timely door-in to door-out (DIDO) interval (≤30 minutes) vs. Not timely DIDO interval (>30 minutes) was evaluated on Timely PPCI (door-to-device time ≤90 minutes) (p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: