Why the study?
Does Micro stent implantation improve quantitative angiographic outcomes and clinical success in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does Micro stent implantation improve quantitative angiographic outcomes and clinical success in patients with coronary artery disease?
Micro stent implantation demonstrated high procedural success (85%) and a low restenosis rate (13%) at 6 months in patients with coronary artery disease.
Micro stent implantation was associated with acute lumen gain and low restenosis; leaves open comparative efficacy versus alternatives in randomized trials.
The Micro stent (MS) is a balloon expandable stent that allows the treatment of stenoses in distal and tortuous coronary arteries. This prospective study was performed to evaluate initial and late results of MS implantations. A total of 127 MS (101 in native coronary arteries and 26 in saphenous vein grafts) were implanted in 85 patients (1.5 stents/pt, 65 male, and 20 female, age 62, +/-10 yr) with angina pectoris class II-III: 21 (25%), angina pectoris class IV: 41(48%), and acute myocardial infarction: 23 (27%). Indications per segment treated (n=93): elective: 49 (53%); suboptimal balloon angioplasty (PTCA) result: 33 (35%); bailout: 11 (12%). The patients were discharged with 100 mg of aspirin daily unless other indications for oral anticoagulants were present. Procedural success (diameter stenosis of 30% without the occurrence of clinical events within 3 wk) was 85%. Early clinical events (<3 wk included: death:1%; subacute closure: 5%; coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG): 1%; vascular complications: 4%. Late clinical events (3 wk-6 mo) included: acute myocardial infarction:3%, PTCA 5%, CABG 3%, angina class Ill-IV: 4%. Quantitative angiographic results were: the minimum lumen diameter increased from 0.90+/-0.72 before to 3.05+/-0.48 mm (<P0.001) after stent implantation. At follow-up, which was 5.5 mo +/-1.1 mo, 61/79 pts (77%), the loss in diameter was 0.90+/-0.68 mm. The net gain was 1.26+/-0.90 mm. The restenosis rate (diameter stenosis > 50% at FU) was 13%. This study demonstrates high procedural and late success rates of Micro stent implantations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schalij et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: