Key result
Risk stratification using clinical and imaging tools is critical in submassive pulmonary embolism to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from aggressive therapies beyond standard anticoagulation.
Case Report (n=1)
This review highlights the clinical challenge of risk stratifying patients with submassive pulmonary embolism and determining when to pursue aggressive therapies beyond standard anticoagulation.
Supports cautious risk stratification in submassive PE; leaves open optimal intervention thresholds without randomized evidence.
The US Surgeon General estimates that 100,000 to 180,000 deaths occur annually from acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in the United States. The case of Ms A, a 60-year-old woman with acute PE and right ventricular dysfunction (submassive PE), illustrates the clinical challenge of identifying this high-risk patient population and determining when more aggressive immediate therapy should be pursued in addition to standard anticoagulation. The clinical examination, electrocardiogram, cardiac biomarkers, chest computed tomography, and echocardiography can be used to risk stratify patients with acute PE. Current options for more aggressive intervention in the treatment of patients with acute PE who are at increased risk of an adverse clinical course include systemic fibrinolysis, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed therapy, surgical pulmonary embolectomy, and inferior vena cava filter insertion. Determination of the optimal duration of anticoagulation and lifestyle modification to reduce overall cardiovascular risk are critical components of the long-term therapy of patients with acute PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregory Piazza (2013) conducted a case report in Acute pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dysfunction (submassive PE) (n=1). Aggressive immediate therapy (e.g., systemic fibrinolysis, catheter-directed therapy, embolectomy) vs. Standard anticoagulation was evaluated. Risk stratification using clinical and imaging tools is critical in submassive pulmonary embolism to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from aggressive therapies beyond standard anticoagulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: