Key result
Robotic arm movement measures strongly predict clinical stroke scores and boost detection of motor recovery.
Cohort (n=208)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because robotic devices record the kinematics and kinetics of human movements with high resolution, we hypothesized that robotic measures collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant relationship to standard clinical outcome measures and, therefore, might provide superior biomarkers. METHODS: In patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, we used clinical scales and robotic devices to measure arm movement 7, 14, 21, 30, and 90 days after the event at 2 clinical sites. The robots are interactive devices that measure speed, position, and force so that calculated kinematic and kinetic parameters could be compared with clinical assessments. RESULTS: Among 208 patients, robotic measures predicted well the clinical measures (cross-validated R(2) of modified Rankin scale=0.60; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale=0.63; Fugl-Meyer=0.73; Motor Power=0.75). When suitably scaled and combined by an artificial neural network, the robotic measures demonstrated greater sensitivity in measuring the recovery of patients from day 7 to day 90 (increased standardized effect=1.47). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that robotic measures of motor performance will more than adequately capture outcome, and the altered effect size will reduce the required sample size. Reducing sample size will likely improve study efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krebs et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke (n=208). Robotic measurement of arm movements vs. Standard clinical outcome scales (modified Rankin scale, NIHSS, Fugl-Meyer, Motor Power) was evaluated on Prediction of clinical outcome measures (mRS, NIHSS, Fugl-Meyer, Motor Power) and sensitivity in measuring motor recovery from day 7 to day 90 (Cross-validated R² 0.60-0.75; increased standardized effect 1.47). Robotic arm movement measures strongly predicted clinical stroke scales (R²=0.60-0.75) and increased sensitivity for motor recovery from day 7 to 90 (standardized effect=1.47).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: