Fluctuations in the abundance of butterflies at many sites in Britain are monitored in a national scheme. Both annual fluctuations and long term trends at individual sites are often very closely synchronised with regional data which excludes the study sites. I argue from such synchrony: (1) that these population are likely to be limited by density-dependent factors and (2) that population fluctuations are little influenced by interactions which are specific to local communities
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. Pollard (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: