Why the study?
Epicardial fat correlates directly with coronary lesions, but the relationship between different obesity measurements and epicardial fat thickness required analysis in non-diabetic young adults.
Do obesity measurement parameters (BMI, waist circumference, body fat percentage) correlate with epicardial fat thickness in non-diabetic young adults?
Do obesity measurement parameters (BMI, waist circumference, body fat percentage) correlate with epicardial fat thickness in non-diabetic young adults?
Body Mass Index demonstrates a stronger correlation with epicardial fat thickness than waist circumference or body fat percentage in non-diabetic young adults.
Association between obesity metrics and epicardial fat in young non-diabetics is hypothesis-generating; leaves open any role in coronary risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial fat (EF) is the true visceral adipose depot of the heart which lies between the myocardium and visceral pericardium. Several studies show a direct correlation between epicardial fat width and coronary lesions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between obesity measurement and epicardial fat thickness in non-diabetic young adults.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. 90 adults participated in the study. Anthropometric measurements were taken including body weight and height (to measure Body Mass Index [BMI]), waist circumference (WC) and body fat percentage (BFP) using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) tool Tanita BC-418 Body Composition Analyzer. EF thickness was examined using echocardiography.RESULTS: From the statistical test results for the BMI variable, the P value <0.001 indicates statistical significance between BMI and EF thickness. According to the R-value, the correlation between BMI and EF thickness was categorized as strong (R>0.500). For the WC variable, the P value <0.001 indicates statistical significance between WC and EF thickness. According to the R-value, WC and EF thickness were moderately correlated (0.250 min R min 0.500). For the BFP variable, the obtained P value was <0.001, which shows statistical significance between BFP and EF thickness. Based on the R-value, the correlation between BFP and EF thickness was categorized as moderate direct correlation (0.250 min R min 0.500).CONCLUSIONS: Obesity measurement parameters with BMI, WC, and BFP methods correlate with EF thickness. Of the three methods, BMI demonstrates the strongest correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HARTUNGI et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: