Why the study?
Does low molecular weight heparin provide a safer and effective alternative to warfarin or unfractionated heparin for preventing thromboembolism in pregnant patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Does low molecular weight heparin provide a safer and effective alternative to warfarin or unfractionated heparin for preventing thromboembolism in pregnant patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Low molecular weight heparin is proposed as a potentially safer alternative to warfarin and unfractionated heparin for pregnant patients with prosthetic heart valves, warranting clinical trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LMWH should not yet alter anticoagulation in pregnant prosthetic valve patients; leaves open the need for RCTs to define its role.
The management of anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of thromboembolism from prosthetic heart valves in the pregnant patient is far from ideal and deserves more clinical research. Warfarin therapy given alone throughout pregnancy poses high risks to the fetus because it crosses the placental barrier. Heparin alone throughout pregnancy poses high risks to the mother, which might be lessened somewhat by more intensive therapeutic regimens and careful monitoring of the heparin level or anticoagulated state of the blood. Because of the major risk of embryopathy in the fetus during the first trimester and latter half of the third trimester, heparin therapy during those times has been recommended. In the opinion of some experts, high-risk cases may benefit from low-dose aspirin in addition to anticoagulant therapy. The fact that warfarin is contraindicated during pregnancy (according to the pharmaceutical company that markets it) poses some problems for the physician who prescribes it. For the above reason, alternative drugs are worthy of consideration and should be given clinical trials. Low molecular weight heparin has the potential for greatly reducing drug-related risk for the fetus while providing greater safety for the mother.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messmore et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: