Why the study?
Does heart rate variability (HRV) assessment predict subsequent ischemic events in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke?
Does heart rate variability (HRV) assessment predict subsequent ischemic events in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke?
Heart rate variability may serve as a comprehensive marker of chronic stress and autonomic dysfunction, offering potential predictive value for secondary ischemic events following TIA or minor stroke.
HRV should not yet guide secondary prevention after TIA or minor stroke; leaves open its predictive value in prospective cohorts.
Transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke have high risks of recurrence and deterioration into severe ischemic strokes. Risk stratification of TIA and minor stroke is essential for early effective treatment. Traditional tools have only moderate predictive value, likely due to their inclusion of the limited number of stroke risk factors. Our review follows Hans Selye's fundamental work on stress theory and the progressive shift of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) from adaptation to disease when stress becomes chronic. We will first show that traditional risk factors and acute triggers of ischemic stroke are chronic and acute stress factors or "stressors," respectively. Our first review shows solid evidence of the relationship between chronic stress and stroke occurrence. The stress response is tightly regulated by the ANS whose function can be assessed with heart rate variability (HRV). Our second review demonstrates that stress-related risk factors of ischemic stroke are correlated with ANS dysfunction and impaired HRV. Our conclusions support the idea that HRV parameters may represent the combined effects of all body stressors that are risk factors for ischemic stroke and, thus, may be of important predictive value for the risk of subsequent ischemic events after TIA or minor stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: