The mengovirus L protein is more potent than the FMDV L(pro) protease at suppressing type I interferon responses in a mengovirus background.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distinguishes L protein potency in IFN suppression across picornaviruses; leaves open relevance to FMDV pathogenesis and countermeasures.
Picornaviruses encompass a large family of RNA viruses. Some picornaviruses possess a leader (L) protein at the N-terminus of their polyprotein. The L proteins of encephalomyocarditis virus, a cardiovirus, and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), an aphthovirus, are both dispensable for replication and their major function seems to be the suppression of antiviral host cell responses. Previously, we showed that the L protein of mengovirus, a strain of encephalomyocarditis virus, inhibits antiviral responses by inhibiting type I interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) gene transcription. The L protein of the FMDV is a protease (L(pro)) that cleaves cellular factors to reduce cytokine and chemokine mRNA production and to inhibit cap-dependent cellular host mRNA translation, thereby limiting the production of proteins with antiviral activity. In this study, we constructed a viable chimeric mengovirus that expresses FMDV L(pro) in place of the authentic L protein in order to compare the efficiency of the immune evasion mechanisms mediated by L and L(pro) respectively. We show that in this mengovirus background the L protein is more potent than FMDV L(pro) in suppressing IFN-alpha/beta responses. Yet, FMDV L(pro) is important to antagonize infection-limiting responses both in vitro and in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hato et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: