Why the study?
Can positron emission tomography measurement of pulmonary transcapillary escape rate (PTCER) differentiate between hydrostatic (CHF) and permeability (ARDS/pneumonia) pulmonary edema?
Can positron emission tomography measurement of pulmonary transcapillary escape rate (PTCER) differentiate between hydrostatic (CHF) and permeability (ARDS/pneumonia) pulmonary edema?
PET measurement of PTCER can identify abnormal pulmonary vascular permeability, helping to differentiate ARDS and pneumonia from congestive heart failure.
PTCER elevation on PET may distinguish permeability from hydrostatic edema; hypothesis-generating for clinical differentiation of ARDS from CHF.
We measured extravascular density (EVD) and the pulmonary transcapillary escape rate (PTCER) for 68Ga-transferrin using positron emission tomography in 14 normal volunteers and 29 patients with radiographic infiltrates, including six patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), eight patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and 15 patients with focal pneumonia. Contralateral, radiographically normal regions were also evaluated in the patients with focal pneumonia. Mean EVD was elevated in the patients with CHF, ARDS, and pneumonia in regions of radiographic infiltrate compared with values from normal subjects (p less than 0.05), but it was not significantly different among the three patient groups. PTCER in normal subjects and in patients with CHF was not significantly different (21 +/- 11 versus 44 +/- 16 x 10(-4) min-1, respectively, p = NS). PTCER was elevated in regions of infiltrate because of either pneumonia (173 +/- 99) or ARDS (170 +/- 79). PTCER was also elevated in regions contralateral to those with focal infiltrate during pneumonia, even though these regions were radiographically normal and had normal EVD values. These results suggest that PTCER is a sensitive but nonspecific index of abnormal pulmonary vascular permeability, which may be useful for classifying patients in clinical studies of pulmonary edema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: