Key result
Viruses utilize unconventional strategies to usurp the host translational machinery, modulate translation initiation factors, and increase viral coding capacity to ensure viral protein synthesis.
This review highlights diverse viral strategies for hijacking host translational machinery, providing insights into viral-host interactions and translational control.
May inform antiviral development targeting translation; extends viral-host interaction insights but leaves clinical adoption open.
Viral genomes are compact and encode a limited number of proteins. Because they do not encode components of the translational machinery, viruses exhibit an absolute dependence on the host ribosome and factors for viral messenger RNA (mRNA) translation. In order to recruit the host ribosome, viruses have evolved unique strategies to either outcompete cellular transcripts that are efficiently translated by the canonical translation pathway or to reroute translation factors and ribosomes to the viral genome. Furthermore, viruses must evade host antiviral responses and escape immune surveillance. This review focuses on some recent major findings that have revealed unconventional strategies that viruses utilize, which include usurping the host translational machinery, modulating canonical translation initiation factors to specifically enhance or repress overall translation for the purpose of viral production, and increasing viral coding capacity. The discovery of these diverse viral strategies has provided insights into additional translational control mechanisms and into the viral host interactions that ensure viral protein synthesis and replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Au et al. (2014) conducted a review in Viral infection. Viral translation strategies was evaluated. Viruses utilize unconventional strategies to usurp the host translational machinery, modulate translation initiation factors, and increase viral coding capacity to ensure viral protein synthesis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: