Key result
In young adults, isolated systolic hypertension only predicted future hypertension needing treatment when accompanied by high 24-hour mean blood pressure (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.16-2.49).
Why the study?
Does isolated systolic hypertension identified by ambulatory monitoring increase the risk of incident hypertension needing treatment in young adults?
Cohort (n=1,206)
Does isolated systolic hypertension identified by ambulatory monitoring increase the risk of incident hypertension needing treatment in young adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.7 (95% CI 1.16–2.49)
In young adults with isolated systolic hypertension, only those with elevated 24-hour mean blood pressure are at increased risk of developing hypertension requiring pharmacological treatment.
May warrant closer monitoring for young adults with ISH plus high 24-hour BP; leaves open ambulatory monitoring's role in routine risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in youth is controversial. One main confounding factor is the strong white-coat effect often observed in ISH patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of hypertension needing pharmacological treatment in ISH identified with ambulatory 24-h blood pressure (24-h BP). METHODS: We examined 1206, 18-45-year-old participants from the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording VEnetia STudy. Based on 24-h BP, 269 participants were normotensive, 209 had ISH, 277 had isolated diastolic hypertension, and 451 had systolic-diastolic hypertension. The predictive role of ISH for incident hypertension was evaluated in Cox survival analyses, adjusting for risk factors and confounders. RESULTS: ISH participants were more frequently young men active in sports, with lower heart rate and cholesterol. During a 6.9-year follow-up, 61.1% of participants developed hypertension. ISH participants had a nonsignificant increase in risk of hypertension compared with normotensive (reference group). In contrast, participants with diastolic hypertension (1.44; 1.13-1.85) or systolic-diastolic hypertension (2.04; 1.59-2.64) had a significant increase in risk. When the ISH participants were divided according to whether 24-h mean BP was normal (<97 mmHg) or high, ISH patients with normal mean BP had no increase in risk (1.01; 0.73-1.40), whereas those with high mean BP had a significant increase in risk (1.70; 1.16-2.49). CONCLUSION: These data obtained with ambulatory BP monitoring show that in ISH people younger than 45 years, only mean BP is a predictor of future hypertension needing treatment, whereas the ISH status per se does not necessarily imply an increase in risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palatini et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Isolated systolic hypertension (n=1,206). Isolated systolic hypertension with high 24-h mean blood pressure vs. Normotensive participants was evaluated on Incident hypertension needing pharmacological treatment (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.16-2.49). In young adults, isolated systolic hypertension only predicted future hypertension needing treatment when accompanied by high 24-hour mean blood pressure (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.16-2.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: