Key result
Ultrasound echo intensity corrected for subcutaneous fat thickness correlated moderately to strongly with extramyocellular lipids and intramuscular fat measured by MRS (r=0.41-0.84, p<0.05).
Why the study?
This study aimed to compare different ultrasound devices with magnetic resonance spectroscopy to quantify muscle lipid content from echo intensity.
Can ultrasound echo intensity accurately quantify muscle lipid content compared to magnetic resonance spectroscopy in lower limb muscles?
Cross-Sectional
Can ultrasound echo intensity accurately quantify muscle lipid content compared to magnetic resonance spectroscopy in lower limb muscles?
Effect estimate: r = 0.41-0.84
p-value: p=<0.05
Subcutaneous fat thickness-corrected ultrasound echo intensity can be used to quantify intramuscular fat and extramyocellular lipids in lower limb muscles of non-obese subjects across different ultrasound devices.
Ultrasound may offer a practical surrogate for MRS muscle lipid assessment; leaves open prospective outcome studies before clinical use.
This study aimed to compare different ultrasound devices with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to quantify muscle lipid content from echo intensity (EI). Four different ultrasound devices were used to measure muscle EI and subcutaneous fat thickness in four lower-limb muscles. Intramuscular fat (IMF), intramyocellular (IMCL) and extramyocellular lipids (EMCL) were measured using MRS. Linear regression was used to compare raw and subcutaneous fat thickness-corrected EI values to IMCL, EMCL and IMF. IMCL had a poor correlation with muscle EI (r = 0.17–0.32, NS), while EMCL (r = 0.41–0.84, p < 0.05–p < 0.001) and IMF (r = 0.49–0.84, p < 0.01–p < 0.001) had moderate to strong correlation with raw EI. All relationships were improved when considering the effect of subcutaneous fat thickness on muscle EI measurements. The slopes of the relationships were similar across devices, but there were some differences in the y-intercepts when raw EI values were used. These differences disappeared when subcutaneous fat thickness-corrected EI values were considered, allowing for the creation of generic prediction equations (r = 0.41–0.68, p < 0.001). These equations can be used to quantify IMF and EMCL within lower limb muscles from corrected-EI values in non-obese subjects, regardless of the ultrasound device used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piponnier et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-obese subjects. Ultrasound echo intensity vs. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was evaluated on Correlation of muscle echo intensity with intramyocellular (IMCL), extramyocellular lipids (EMCL), and intramuscular fat (IMF) (r = 0.41-0.84, p=<0.05). Ultrasound echo intensity corrected for subcutaneous fat thickness correlated moderately to strongly with extramyocellular lipids and intramuscular fat measured by MRS (r=0.41-0.84, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: