Key result
A Lean Six Sigma quality improvement project utilizing geographic cohorting and multidisciplinary huddles increased the percentage of discharge orders released by 10:00 a.m. by 21.3 percentage points (adjusted OR 2.62).
Why the study?
Does a Lean Six Sigma quality improvement intervention improve timeliness of discharge in hospitalized patients?
Does a Lean Six Sigma quality improvement intervention improve timeliness of discharge in hospitalized patients?
Odds Ratio: 2.62 (95% CI 1.91–3.59)
Absolute Event Rate: 47.1% vs 26.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
A Lean Six Sigma quality improvement program utilizing geographic cohorting and multidisciplinary huddles significantly improved the timeliness of hospital discharge orders and physical discharges by noon without adversely affecting length of stay or readmissions.
May support Lean Six Sigma approaches for earlier discharges; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before wider adoption.
BACKGROUND: Hospital overcrowding has become a widespread problem, with constrained bed capacity and admission bottlenecks having far-reaching negative impacts on quality and safety. Focus on timing of discharge may be the least disruptive and most effective way to address constrained bed capacity, yet there may be significant institution-specific barriers to implementation. METHODS: With the creation of a "Value Team," a 627-bed, tertiary care academic medical center embarked on a quality improvement (QI) project using Lean Six Sigma process improvement methodology. After defining the problems around timeliness of discharge, the team went through the steps in the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) framework. Interventions, which were implemented on the basis of an in-depth analysis of barriers to the discharge process, included geographic cohorts of internal medicine physicians on specific hospital units and multidisciplinary huddles one day before anticipated discharge. RESULTS: After accounting for the concurrent trends in the control group, the percentage of discharge orders released by 10:00 a.m. increased by 21.3 points (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.91-3.59), and the percentage of patients discharged by noon increased by 7.5 points (p = 0.001; adjusted OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.15-2.51). There were no significant changes in the 30-day readmission rate or length of stay. CONCLUSION: A QI program shaped by Lean Six Sigma principles and reinforced by clinician huddles and geographic cohorting was associated with earlier posting of discharge orders and physical discharge by noon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molla et al. (2018) studied Inpatients on nonteaching hospitalist service (n=4,134). Lean Six Sigma quality improvement project (geographic cohorts and multidisciplinary huddles) vs. Standard care (non-cohorted hospitalist services without multidisciplinary huddles) was evaluated on Percentage of discharge orders released by 10:00 a.m. (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.91-3.59, p=<0.001). A Lean Six Sigma quality improvement project utilizing geographic cohorting and multidisciplinary huddles increased the percentage of discharge orders released by 10:00 a.m. by 21.3 percentage points (adjusted OR 2.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: