Key result
Among Chinese adults with prior cardiovascular disease, only 35% used secondary preventive drugs, with use strongly associated with diagnosed hypertension (OR 7.5; 95% CI 7.08-8.06).
Why the study?
What is the rate of use of secondary preventive medications for cardiovascular disease in urban and rural communities of China?
Cross-Sectional (n=512,891)
Yes
What is the rate of use of secondary preventive medications for cardiovascular disease in urban and rural communities of China?
Odds Ratio: 7.5 (95% CI 7.08–8.06)
Only about one-third of individuals with prior cardiovascular disease in China are routinely treated with proven secondary preventive medications, highlighting a significant gap in secondary prevention.
Highlights substantial gaps in secondary prevention for Chinese adults with prior CVD; leaves open optimal strategies to improve medication use.
AIMS: Relatively little is known about the use of medication for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in China, and the relevance to it of socioeconomic, lifestyle and health-related factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed cross-sectional data from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) of 512,891 adults aged 30-79 years recruited from 1737 rural and urban communities in China. Information about doctor-diagnosed ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke, and the use of medication for the secondary prevention of CVD events, were recorded by interview. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for use of secondary preventive treatment, adjusting simultaneously for age, sex, area and education. Overall, 23,129 (4.5%) participants reported a history of CVD (3.0% IHD, 1.7% stroke). Among them, 35% reported current use of any of 6 classes of drug (anti-platelet, statins, diuretics, ACE-I, β-blockers or calcium-channel blockers) for the prevention of CVD events, with the rate of usage greater in those with older age, higher levels of income, education, BMI or blood pressure. The use of these agents was associated positively with history of diagnosed hypertension (OR 7.5; 95% confidence intervals: 7.08-8.06) and diabetes (1.40; 1.28-1.52) and inversely with self-rated health status, but there was no association with years since diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent improvements in hospital care in China, only one in three individuals with prior CVD was routinely treated with any proven secondary preventive drugs. The treatment rates were correlated with the existence of other risk factors, in particular evidence of hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=512,891). History of diagnosed hypertension vs. No history of diagnosed hypertension was evaluated on Use of secondary preventive treatment (OR 7.5, 95% CI 7.08-8.06). Among Chinese adults with prior cardiovascular disease, only 35% used secondary preventive drugs, with use strongly associated with diagnosed hypertension (OR 7.5; 95% CI 7.08-8.06).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: