Why the study?
Can artificial neural networks accurately predict pulmonary embolism from ventilation-perfusion scans compared to experienced physicians?
Can artificial neural networks accurately predict pulmonary embolism from ventilation-perfusion scans compared to experienced physicians?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial neural networks can be optimized to predict pulmonary embolism from V-P scans with performance comparable to experienced physicians.
PURPOSE: To optimize the performance of artificial neural networks in the prediction of pulmonary embolism from ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neural networks were constructed with a set of V-P scan criteria that included sharpness and completeness of perfusion defects and involved quantification of abnormalities by using a continuous numeric scale. Several network parameters were systematically varied. Networks were trained with 150 cases and tested with 30 different cases. Findings were compared with those of pulmonary angiography. RESULTS: Networks capable of performing as well as experienced nuclear medicine physicians could be constructed with few V-P scan features. A brief training period was optimal (50-100 iterations). Further training diminished network performance. CONCLUSION: Effective neural networks can be constructed by using a limited number of unconventional V-P scan features. Several parameters can be adjusted to optimize performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: