Key result
Gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters did not significantly impact the dose-adjusted trough concentration of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Rivaroxaban is cleared via multiple pathways, but the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein, BCRP, CYP3A5, and CYP2J2 on its pharmacokinetics required evaluation.
Do gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters impact the trough concentrations of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=86)
Do gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters impact the trough concentrations of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Pharmacokinetic genotype tests for drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are unlikely to be useful for predicting rivaroxaban trough concentrations in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Should not guide rivaroxaban dosing by genotyping; leaves open pharmacogenetic utility in larger, diverse cohorts.
Rivaroxaban is excreted from the body via multiple pathways involving glomerular filtration, drug‐metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P‐glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and CYP2J2 on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Eighty‐six patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing AF catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. In these analyses, the dose‐adjusted plasma trough concentration ratio (C 0h /D) of rivaroxaban was used as the pharmacokinetic index. The median (quartile range) rivaroxaban C 0h /D was 3.39 (2.08‐5.21) ng/mL/mg (coefficient of variation: 80.5%). The C 0h /D did not differ significantly among ABCB1 c.3435C>T, c.2677G>A/T, c.1236C>T, ABCG2 c.421C>A, CYP3A5*3 and CYP2J2*7 genotypes. Stepwise selection multiple linear regression analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only independent factor influencing the C 0h /D of rivaroxaban ( R 2 = 0.152, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the C 0h of rivaroxaban and prothrombin time (PT) ( rho = 0.357, P = 0.001). In patients with NVAF, pharmacokinetic genotype tests are unlikely to be useful for prediction of the C 0h of rivaroxaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=86). Gene polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, CYP3A5 and CYP2J2 vs. Different genotypes was evaluated on Dose-adjusted plasma trough concentration ratio (C0h/D) of rivaroxaban. Gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters did not significantly impact the dose-adjusted trough concentration of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: