Key result
ABCB1 c.2482-2236C>T CC genotype is linked to ~99% higher bleeding risk vs TT in rivaroxaban-treated NVAF.
Why the study?
The influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes in NVAF patients was unclear.
Do ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms affect the plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with NVAF?
Observational (n=228)
Do ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms affect the plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with NVAF?
Relative Risk: 1.99 (95% CI 1.08–3.69)
ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms significantly influence rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and are associated with altered risks of bleeding and thromboembolic events in Chinese patients with NVAF.
Hypothesis-generating for ABCB1-guided rivaroxaban dosing in Chinese NVAF; should not change practice without prospective validation.
Background This study utilized a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) approach to assess the influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on the plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban. Methods The PPK model for rivaroxaban was developed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to derive peak concentration (Cmax) and trough concentration (Ctrough). ABCB1 genetic variants were analyzed for their impact on the plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes. Results Analysis of 287 rivaroxaban plasma concentrations from 228 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients revealed significant associations between AST (aspartate aminotransferase)/ALT (alanine aminotransferase) ratios and the apparent clearance (CL/F), the apparent volume of distribution (V/F). ABCB1 1236C>T TT and ABCB1 c.2482-2236C>T CC genotypes exhibited higher dose-adjusted Cmax (Cmax/D) compared to other relevant genotypes. Additionally, the ABCB1 3435C>T TT genotype showed lower dose-adjusted Ctrough (Ctrough/D) compared to CC or CT genotypes. For clinical outcomes, the ABCB1 c.2482–2236C>T CC genotype had a higher bleeding risk compared to TT (RR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.08–3.69) or CT genotypes (RR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.04–1.92), and ABCB1 3435C>T TT genotype showed a higher thromboembolic risk compared to CC genotype (RR = 3.48, 95% CI 1.02–11.85). Conclusion The PPK model incorporated CL/F and V/F with the covariate AST/ALT. Model-based simulations revealed that ABCB1 1236C>T, ABCB1 c.2482–2236C>T, and ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes had significant impacts on the plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban. Specifically, ABCB1 c.2482-2236C>T and ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes were associated with bleeding events and thromboembolic events, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=228). ABCB1 c.2482-2236C>T CC genotype vs. ABCB1 c.2482-2236C>T TT genotype was evaluated on Bleeding risk (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.08-3.69). The ABCB1 c.2482–2236C>T CC genotype was associated with a higher bleeding risk compared to the TT genotype in Chinese NVAF patients taking rivaroxaban (RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.08–3.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: