Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation participation had no effect on employment status three years after percutaneous coronary intervention, with 70% of patients <60 years employed at follow-up.
Why the study?
Information was lacking on whether cardiac rehabilitation leads to higher long-term employment after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Does cardiac rehabilitation participation improve employment status three years after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=2,488)
Yes
Does cardiac rehabilitation participation improve employment status three years after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cardiac rehabilitation participation did not improve employment status three years after PCI, indicating a need for targeted vocational support programs.
Does not support altering cardiac rehabilitation practices for employment post-PCI; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Vocational support is recommended for patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), as returning to work is important in patients social readjusting after an acute coronary event. Information is lacking on whether CR leads to higher long-term employment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine employment status three years after PCI, to compare employment status between CR participants and CR non-participants and to assess predictors for employment. METHODS: = 2488) at a three-year follow-up. Employment status and CR participation were assessed using a self-report questionnaire. Propensity score method was used in comparing employment status of CR participants and CR non-participants. RESULTS: Seventy per cent of participants who were <60 years of age at the index event were employed at follow-up and CR participation had no effect on employment status. Being male, living with a partner and attaining higher levels of education were associated with a higher chance of being employed, while being older, prior cardiovascular morbidity and smoking status were associated with lower chance of being employed at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Because a significant number of working-age coronary heart disease patients are unemployed three years after coronary revascularization, updated incentives should be implemented to promote vocational support. Such programmes should focus on females, patients lacking higher education and patients who are living alone, as they are more likely to remain unemployed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsen et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=2,488). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation vs. CR non-participants was evaluated on Employment status three years after PCI. Cardiac rehabilitation participation had no effect on employment status three years after percutaneous coronary intervention, with 70% of patients <60 years employed at follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: