Why the study?
Does external feedback and incentives alter diastolic blood pressure in normal male subjects?
Does external feedback and incentives alter diastolic blood pressure in normal male subjects?
External feedback and incentives allowed normal male subjects to voluntarily control their diastolic blood pressure, suggesting potential therapeutic applications for essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feedback-enabled voluntary diastolic BP control may be feasible in normotensives; leaves open therapeutic applications in hypertension pending randomized trials.
When provided with external feedback of their diastolic blood pressure and incentives to respond appropriately, normal male Ss learned to raise or lower their diastolic pressure in a 35‐min training session. The difference between increase and decrease groups at the end of conditioning was 7.0 mm Hg or 10% of baseline. This difference was augmented to 10.4 mm Hg or 15% of baseline during extinction when half the Ss were asked to maintain continuing “voluntary control” even though feedback and incentives were withdrawn. Heart rate was also influenced when diastolic blood pressure was reinforced, although less markedly. Further analysis indicated that when diastolic pressure is reinforced, heart rate is partially reinforced in the same direction, accounting for the coincidental conditioning of the related cardiovascular measure. No consistent changes in respiration or post‐session verbal reports were obtained. These results lend support to the possibility of therapeutic application of the techniques in patients with essential hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shapiro et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: