Key result
Maximum principal strain demonstrated higher values compared to axial strain (slope 1.6), and the angle of insonification did not significantly alter the relationship between strain types.
Why the study?
Carotid plaque rupture causes stroke or TIA, and interest has emerged in using insonification angle-independent principal strains to quantify plaque instability along the longitudinal view.
Does principal strain imaging provide angle-independent quantification of carotid plaque instability compared to traditional angle-dependent strain imaging?
Observational (n=76)
Does principal strain imaging provide angle-independent quantification of carotid plaque instability compared to traditional angle-dependent strain imaging?
Effect estimate: Slope 1.6
Principal strain imaging provides an angle-independent method for quantifying carotid plaque strain, potentially improving the assessment of plaque instability.
May guide strain metric selection in imaging; extends biomechanical data but leaves clinical utility open.
Carotid plaque rupture can result in stroke or transient ischemic attack that can be devastating for patients. Ultrasound strain imaging provides a noninvasive method to identify unstable plaque likely to rupture. Axial, lateral and shear strains in carotid plaque have been shown to be linked to carotid plaque instability. Recently, there has been interest in using principal strains, which do not depend on angle of insonification of the carotid artery for quantifying instability in plaque along the longitudinal view. In this work relationships between angle dependent axial, lateral and shear strain along with axis independent principal strains are compared. Three strain indices were defined, (1) Average Mean Strain (AMS), (2) Maximum Mean Strain (MMS) and (3) Mean Standard Deviation (MSD) to identify relationships between these five strain image types in a group of 76 i n vivo patients. The maximum principal strain demonstrated the highest strain values when compared to axial strain for all patients with a linear regression slope of 1.6 and a y intercept of 2.4 percent strain for AMS. The maximum shear strain when compared to shear strain had a slope of 1.15 and a y intercept of 0.21 percent for AMS. Next, the effect of insonification angle, which is the angle subtended by the artery at the location of plaque was studied. Patients were divided into three sub groups, i.e. less than 5 degrees (n = 31), between 5 and 10 degrees (n = 24) and above 10 degrees (n = 21). The angle of insonification did not make a significant difference between the three angle groups when comparing the relationship between the angle dependent and independent strain values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meshram et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Carotid plaque (n=76). Principal strain imaging (angle independent) vs. Angle dependent strain imaging (axial, lateral, shear) was evaluated on Relationship between angle dependent and independent strain values (Average Mean Strain) (Slope 1.6). Maximum principal strain demonstrated higher values compared to axial strain (slope 1.6), and the angle of insonification did not significantly alter the relationship between strain types.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: