Key result
Multi-vector cardiac impedance monitoring showed that LV-Can impedance decreased by 17±9% during CHF and correlated well with left atrial pressure (r2=0.73).
Why the study?
Does multi-vector cardiac impedance monitoring correlate with left atrial pressure in a preclinical model of pacing-induced congestive heart failure?
Does multi-vector cardiac impedance monitoring correlate with left atrial pressure in a preclinical model of pacing-induced congestive heart failure?
Left-heart impedance vectors correlate well with left atrial pressure in a preclinical model, suggesting they may improve the detection of congestive heart failure compared to right-heart leads alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LV-Can impedance may track left atrial pressure in this model; leaves open clinical utility of multi-vector monitoring.
Introduction: For monitoring pulmonary edema secondary to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), we investigated trends of impedance between implanted electrodes. Methods: ICDs were implanted in 16 dogs and 5 sheep. Right ventricles were paced (230–250 bpm) for several weeks. Impedance was measured every hour along 4 intrathoracic, 2 intracardiac and 4 cardiogenic vectors. Cardiac function was assessed biweekly by catheterization and echocardiography. Left Atrial Pressure (LAP) was measured daily by an implanted sensor. Results: All animals developed CHF after 2–4 weeks of pacing (EF, 52 vs. 34%; LVEDV, 65 vs. 97 ml; LVEDP, 7 vs. 16 mm Hg; LAV, 17 vs. 33 ml; LAP, 7 vs. 26 mm Hg). Impedance decreased during CHF: LV-Can, 17±9%; LV–RV, 15±8%; LV–RA, 13±6%; RV-Can, 13±8%; RV coil-Can, 8±6%; RA-Can, 6±6%. The LV-Can decrease was greatest and correlated well with LAP (r2=0.73). All impedances were associated with circadian variability at the baseline, which diminished during CHF (5±2% vs. 2±1%). In CHF, cardiogenic impedances displayed reduced peak-to-peak amplitude and increased fractionation. Conclusions: As impedance decreased during CHF, left-heart trends were better correlated with LAP. Left-heart vectors may improve the detection of CHF compared to sensing by right-heart leads alone. This approach has important clinical implications for managing HF patients in ambulatory settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panescu et al. (2011) studied Congestive Heart Failure (n=21). Multi-vector cardiac impedance monitoring vs. Baseline was evaluated on Correlation of LV-Can impedance decrease with Left Atrial Pressure (LAP) (r2=0.73). Multi-vector cardiac impedance monitoring showed that LV-Can impedance decreased by 17±9% during CHF and correlated well with left atrial pressure (r2=0.73).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: