Key result
Intracardiac impedance changes strongly correlated with left ventricular stroke volume (R = 0.82 +/- 0.16) and pulse pressure (R = 0.81 +/- 0.16) during graded overdrive bi-ventricular pacing.
Why the study?
Does intracardiac impedance accurately reflect stroke volume and pulse pressure changes in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=14)
Does intracardiac impedance accurately reflect stroke volume and pulse pressure changes in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Intracardiac impedance strongly correlates with left ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure in heart failure patients, suggesting it is a viable method for LV volume monitoring in CRT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support impedance-based LV monitoring in CRT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: Monitoring of haemodynamic parameters or surrogate parameters of the left ventricle is especially important for patients under cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Intracardiac impedance reflects left ventricular (LV) volume changes well in animal models. Since it is unknown whether this also holds in humans with heart failure (HF), we examined the correlation of LV intracardiac impedance with haemodynamic parameters in CRT patients for different positions of the LV lead. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 HF patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (four female, age 70 +/- 6 years, NYHA 2.9 +/- 0.3, EF 26 +/- 6%), one or two suitable implantation sites for the LV lead were selected. Following atrial, right ventricular, and LV catheter positioning, a micro-manometer catheter was placed in the ascending aorta. Surface ECG, impedance, and aortic pressure were recorded during graded overdrive bi-ventricular pacing in DDD mode. The correlation between impedance and stroke volume (SV) or pulse pressure (PP) changes was compared for different LV lead positions. In total, 20 overdrive pacing tests were performed at six different LV lead positions. Strong correlations were found between stroke impedance (SZ) and SV (R = 0.82 +/- 0.16) as well as between SZ and PP (R = 0.81 +/- 0.16) without significant influence of LV lead position. CONCLUSION: In HF patients, a strong correlation between changes in intracardiac impedance and LV SV was found. Typical LV lead implant positions have been tested and all appear to be suitable for this method of LV volume monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bocchiardo et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Heart failure with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n=14). Intracardiac impedance monitoring was evaluated on Correlation between stroke impedance and stroke volume or pulse pressure changes (R = 0.82 +/- 0.16 (SV), R = 0.81 +/- 0.16 (PP)). Intracardiac impedance changes strongly correlated with left ventricular stroke volume (R = 0.82 +/- 0.16) and pulse pressure (R = 0.81 +/- 0.16) during graded overdrive bi-ventricular pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: