Key result
This study protocol outlines an RCT to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of high intensity interval training versus moderate continuous training in 100 adults with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does high intensity interval training improve exercise capacity in adults with coronary artery disease attending a hospital-initiated cardiac rehabilitation program?
RCT (n=100)
randomized
Does high intensity interval training improve exercise capacity in adults with coronary artery disease attending a hospital-initiated cardiac rehabilitation program?
This study protocol describes a randomized trial comparing subjective RPE-guided high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in a real-world cardiac rehabilitation setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Outlines RCT protocol testing HIIT versus MCT in CAD rehab; leaves open feasibility, safety, and efficacy until results reported.
Taylor et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=100). High intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) was evaluated on change in exercise capacity (peak VO 2 ) following 4 weeks of exercise training. This study protocol outlines an RCT to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of high intensity interval training versus moderate continuous training in 100 adults with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: