The presence of diastase¹in human blood was first noted in 1846²and subsequently the enzyme was found to be a normal constituent of mammalian blood in general. In 1863 the enzyme was shown to be present also in urine, and its origin was traced to the blood.³Eventually diastase was detected in lymph,⁴in pericardial fluid4band in feces.⁵Hepatic bile is almost completely devoid of diastase,⁶but the enzyme can be detected in the bile when the diastase content of blood is greatly increased by ligation of the pancreatic ducts.⁷Bile from the common bile duct and the gallbladder may contain appreciable amounts of diastase as the result of pancreatic reflux.⁸Assertions that measurable amounts of diastase are present in the cerebrospinal fluid,⁹the liver and the kidneys¹⁰are open to doubt. In this laboratory it was not possible to detect diastase in the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Somogyi (1941) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: