Key result
Bosentan treatment for 16 weeks significantly improved right ventricular ejection fraction (median change 8% vs -4%) and remodeling compared to control in patients with CTEPH (all P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does bosentan improve right ventricular function and remodeling in operable patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension waiting for pulmonary endarterectomy?
RCT (n=15)
randomly assigned
Does bosentan improve right ventricular function and remodeling in operable patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension waiting for pulmonary endarterectomy?
p-value: p=<0.05
In patients with operable CTEPH, 16 weeks of bosentan pretreatment before pulmonary endarterectomy significantly improves right ventricular function and remodeling.
Supports bosentan pretreatment to optimize RV function before PEA in operable CTEPH; extends RCT evidence for endothelin antagonism on remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Medical pretreatment before pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) can optimize right ventricular (RV) function and may improve postoperative outcome in high-risk patients. Using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), we determined whether the dual endothelin-1 antagonist bosentan improves RV function and remodeling in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who waited for PEA. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that medical therapy prior to PEA will be associated with improvements in RV remodeling and function. METHODS: In this pilot study, 15 operable CTEPH patients were randomly assigned to either bosentan (n = 8) or no bosentan (n = 7, control) for 16 weeks, next to "best standard of care." Both before and after treatment, RV stroke volume index (RVSVI), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), RV mass, RV isovolumic relaxation time (rIVRT), leftward ventricular septal bowing (LVSB), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined using cMRI. RESULTS: After 16 weeks, the change (Δ) from baseline (median [range]) in the studied cMRI parameters differed significantly between the bosentan group and the controls: Δ RVSVI: 6 [-4-11] vs 1 [-6-3] mL/m(-2) ; Δ RVEF: 8 [-10-15] vs -4 [-7-5]%; Δ RV mass: -3 [-6--2] vs 2 [-1-3] g/m(-2) ; Δ rIVRT: -30 [-130-20] vs 10 [-30-30] msec; Δ LVSB: 0.03 [-0.03-0.13] vs -0.03[-0.08-0.04] cm(-1) ; and Δ LVEF: 8 [-5-17] vs -2 [-14-2]% (all P < 0.05). The change from baseline in mean pulmonary artery pressure (-11 [-17-11] vs 5 [-6-21] mm Hg, P < 0.05) and 6-minute walk distance (20 [3-88] vs -4 [-40-40] m, P < 0.05) also differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In CTEPH, compared with control, treatment with bosentan for 16 weeks was associated with a significant improvement in cMRI parameters of RV function and remodelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Surie et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=15). Bosentan vs. No bosentan (control) plus best standard of care was evaluated on Change from baseline in cMRI parameters of RV function and remodeling (RVSVI, RVEF, RV mass, rIVRT, LVSB, LVEF) (p=<0.05). Bosentan treatment for 16 weeks significantly improved right ventricular ejection fraction (median change 8% vs -4%) and remodeling compared to control in patients with CTEPH (all P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: