Key result
Incident cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (5.36 vs 2.27 per 100 patient-years) and thromboembolism compared to those without cancer.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant management in patients with atrial fibrillation and active cancer is complex, and while previous studies assessed any cancer, outcomes may differ by specific cancer type.
Does incident cancer increase the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation on antithrombotic treatment?
Cohort (n=22,996)
Yes
Does incident cancer increase the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation on antithrombotic treatment?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.36% vs 2.27%
Incident cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly increases the risk of both major bleeding and thromboembolism, with risks varying by cancer type and antithrombotic regimen.
Supports cancer-type-specific risk stratification for anticoagulation in AF; leaves open optimal strategies pending randomized data.
Background: Anticoagulant management of patients with atrial fibrillation with active cancer is complex because cancer increases the risk of thrombosis as well as bleeding. Previous studies have investigated the impact of any type of cancer, while outcomes may differ per specific type. We performed the present study to provide more insight into the impact of specific types of cancer on clinical outcomes. Objectives: We examined major bleeding (MB) and thromboembolism (TE) rates associated with antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) who develop cancer and examined whether cancer type affected MB and TE risks. Methods: This Danish population-based cohort study included all patients aged ≥ 50 years discharged with incident AF between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2016, and identified those who subsequently developed cancer. Data on cancer type, outcomes, and antithrombotic exposure were obtained from hospital and drug prescription databases. Follow-up continued from the time of cancer diagnosis until the occurrence of an outcome or the end of the 2-year follow-up. Incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years and adjusted hazard ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using Cox regression. Results: A total of 22,996 patients with AF with subsequent incident cancer were identified. These patients had higher MB (IR, 5.36 [95% CI, 5.09-5.64] vs 2.27 [95% CI, 2.22-2.32]) and TE (IR, 3.91 [95% CI, 3.68-4.15] vs 2.71 [95% CI, 2.66-2.76]) rates than those without cancer. The higher MB rate was observed across all antithrombotic exposure categories. Urogenital (IR, 6.43 [95% CI, 5.94-6.95]) and intracranial cancer (IR, 6.36 [95% CI, 3.85-9.76]) demonstrated the highest MB rates; hematologic (IR, 4.92 [95% CI, 4.12-5.82]) and gastrointestinal cancer (IR, 4.82 [95% CI, 4.31-5.36]) had the highest TE rates. A particularly high MB rate was observed in patients with AF with gastrointestinal cancer and triple antithrombotic therapy (IR, 39.0 [95% CI, 15.5-79.1]). Conclusion: Patients with AF with certain incident cancer types experienced higher rates of MB and TE than those without cancer. Dual/triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF with incident cancer was associated with high bleeding rates, particularly with gastrointestinal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation/flutter and incident cancer (n=22,996). Incident cancer vs. No cancer was evaluated on Major bleeding. Incident cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (5.36 vs 2.27 per 100 patient-years) and thromboembolism compared to those without cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: